The Dalai Lama at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience last Saturday

"Although Buddhist contemplative tradition and modern science have evolved from different historical, intellectual and cultural roots, I believe that at heart they share significant commonalities, especially in their basic philosophical outlook and methodology.

"On the philosophical level, both Buddhism and modern science share a deep suspicion of any notion of absolutes, whether conceptualized as a transcendent being, as an eternal, unchanging principle such as soul, or as a fundamental substratum of reality.

"Both Buddhism and science prefer to account for the evolution and emergence of the cosmos and life in terms of the complex interrelations of the natural laws of cause and effect.

"From the methodological perspective, both traditions emphasize the role of empiricism. For example, in the Buddhist investigative tradition, between the three recognized sources of knowledge - experience, reason and testimony - it is the evidence of the experience that takes precedence, with reason coming second and testimony last.

"This means that, in the Buddhist investigation of reality, at least in principle, empirical evidence should triumph over scriptural authority, no matter how deeply venerated a scripture may be.

"Even in the case of knowledge derived through reason or inference, its validity must derive ultimately from some observed facts of experience."

-- The Dalai Lama at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience last Saturday.

From Good Morning Silicon Valley, a great email news letter.

I am not a Buddhist, I do come from a Christian culture, but I have read many books about Buddha and Buddhism. I respect what I have read, as a way of looking at life Buddhism makes a lot of sense. As with Christianity, what a religion says, and how a religion is practiced, can be different.

I believe in the principles described in the Dalai Lama's quote completely, in fact the quote summarizes some of my core beliefs about truth and knowledge. Even on an ethical level the specific person takes priority over a general principle. Ethics is practiced through our individual acts, not our stated beliefs.